Behind the Scenes: American Petroleum Institute’s Commercial Shoot

Recently, the Checks and Balances Project responded to an open casting call from the American Petroleum Institute (API) to be a part of their multi-million dollar ad campaign targeting the 2012 elections.  API’s Energy Citizens campaign sent an email asking for “all ages and races to express their views in a Commercial Spot on American Made Energy!” Deputy Director Gabe Elsner answered the casting call and got an inside look at how the oil and gas industry communicates with the American public through the creation of public-facing materials. Read about our experience and listen to audio of Mr. Elsner on the set of API’s ‘Vote 4 Energy’ commercial shoot.

The Checks and Balances Project’s look behind the scenes at API’s commercial shoot was covered by the Washington Post. Steven Mufson and Juliet Eilperin write:

Elsner shows up as instructed with three wardrobe options, ranging from a suit to weekend wear. The API and Edelman staffers pick the suit and steam it, pick out a tie, usher him into the makeup room, then send him for the audition. One says he has “a nice, young professional’s look.” Elsner hears Edelman executive Robert McKernan say, “I think we’re done with people in suits after this.”

After being ushered onto the set, Mr. Elsner was asked to repeat a script “written by the agency” instead of “go[ing] on camera and stat[ing] [his] beliefs,” as the casting email described. The Washington Post quoted Mr. Elsner:

“They’re using deception to talk to Americans about the oil and gas industry,” he says. “These multi-million dollar campaigns are clearly being crafted to give the appearance that it’s ordinary people talking. What we experienced was that it was well scripted and totally set up to be the perfect commercial.”

Mr. Elsner’s experience was also covered by National Journal’s Influence Alley, which is a blog covering money, politics and policy, as well as CEO Update (subscription), a publication for association news and executive careers.

The Checks and Balances Project experience at API’s commercial shoot calls into question the credibility of the oil and gas industry’s other advertising that supposedly demonstrates grassroots support.  In August 2009, activists leaked the launch of API’s astroturf campaign “Energy Citizens” and uncovered that oil industry lobbyists organized most of the rallies.

It appears that API’s ‘Vote 4 Energy’ campaign is a continuation of a carefully crafted multi-million dollar public relations plan to convince the American public that ordinary people support the oil and gas industry.

The transition to clean energy is one of the most important challenges facing our nation and millions of dollars in advertising and deceitful commercials from the American Petroleum Institute is spreading misinformation and preventing the American public from having an honest debate.

Morning Energy – Politico 06/02/11

Patrick Reis | June 02, 2011 | Reposted from Politico

SHALE SLAM — “Shale Will Supply Oil to Nation Soon,” the Berkeley Daily Gazette told readers in December … of 1922. This and scores of other positive shale predictions are fodder for a new report from the Checks and Balances Project — an environmental group — that hopes to paint oil shale reserves as perpetually “on the horizon.” The report: http://politico.pro/iMH2w6

Elijah Cummings: GOP attack is Palinesque – Politico 05/24/11

Robin Bravender | May 24, 2011 | Reposted from Politico

Oversight committee Republicans led by Issa this week accused the administration of “pursuing an agenda to raise the price Americans pay for energy” in order to advance its renewable energy agenda. It’s been a familiar theme for Republicans — not just Palin — as prices have spiked amid recent months of turmoil across the Middle East.

Meanwhile, the government oversight group Checks & Balances Project blasted Oversight committee Republicans on Tuesday for raking in more campaign contributions from Big Oil than their Democratic colleagues as they attempt to pin blame for rising prices on the administration.

Issa and other GOP committee members accepted $453,910 dollars from the oil and gas industry during the last election cycle, the group found, compared with $67,400 received by committee Democrats. The group attributed the data to the Center for Responsive Politics’s website, www.opensecrets.org.

As Obama calls for end to oil company tax breaks, new report links surging profits to lobbying efforts – Real Vail 05/03/11

David O. Williams | May 3, 2011 | Reposted from Real Vail

With Congress and the White House increasingly railing against record oil company profits, a study late last week linked those windfalls to millions spent on lobbying and direct campaign contributions.

The nonprofit Checks and Balances Projectlast week released an analysis of the skyrocketing profits of the nation’s top five oil and gas companies in the wake of near-record gas prices and compared those profits to lobbying expenditures and political contributions in 2010.

ExxonMobil reported first quarter 2011 profits of $10.7 billion compared to $6.3 billion in 2010, a 69.8-percent increase. The nation’s largest oil and gas company spent $12.45 million on lobbying in 2010 and made $928,959 in political contributions to Republicans and $109,500 to Democrats.

[Read more.]


Study: Oil and gas profits connected to lobbying, political expenditures – The American Independent 05/2/11

David O. Williams | May 2, 2011 | Reposted from The American Independent

The nonprofit Checks and Balances Project today released an analysis of the skyrocketing profits of the nation’s top five oil and gas companies in the wake of near-record gas prices and compared those profits to lobbying expenditures and political contributions in 2010.

ExxonMobil reported first quarter 2011 profits of $10.7 billion compared to $6.3 billion in 2010, a 69.8-percent increase. The nation’s largest oil and gas company spent $12.45 million on lobbying in 2010 and made $928,959 in political contributions to Republicans and $109,500 to Democrats.

Chevron, which reported Q1 profits of $6.2 billion in 2011 compared to $4.55 billion in 2010, spent more on lobbying in 2010 ($12.89 million) but less on political contributions ($473,000 to Republicans and $122,000 to Democrats).

[Read more.]

Study links soaring oil and gas profits to lobbying, political expenditures – The Colorado Independent 04/29/11

David O. Williams | April 29, 2011 | Reposted from The Colorado Independent

The nonprofit Checks and Balances Project today released an analysis of the skyrocketing profits of the nation’s top five oil and gas companies in the wake of near-record gas prices and compared those profits to lobbying expenditures and political contributions in 2010.

ExxonMobil reported first quarter 2011 profits of $10.7 billion compared to $6.3 billion in 2010, a 69.8-percent increase. The nation’s largest oil and gas company spent $12.45 million on lobbying in 2010 and made $928,959 in political contributions to Republicans and $109,500 to Democrats.

Chevron, which reported Q1 profits of $6.2 billion in 2011 compared to $4.55 billion in 2010, spent more on lobbying in 2010 ($12.89 million) but less on political contributions ($473,000 to Republicans and $122,000 to Democrats).

[Read more.]

Guest Commentary: One year after wakeup call in the Gulf of Mexico Read more: Guest Commentary: One year after wakeup call in the Gulf of Mexico – The Denver Post 04/20/11

Matt Garrington | April 24, 2011 | Reposted from The Denver Post

On April 20, 2010, Americans were reminded, in living color, of the dangers inherent in letting oil companies go unchecked. We sat glued to our televisions and computers, watching the Deepwater Horizon rig burn in the Gulf of Mexico. Observers and pundits immediately began to make comparisons to the last, great American oil spill, the Exxon Valdez disaster.

We learned of the 11 men who lost their lives on Horizon that day and the others burned or injured as they escaped the sinking platform. We stood by, helpless, as millions of gallons of crude oil poured into the Gulf, threatening our ocean waters, local tourism and recreation businesses, and those families who depend on the Gulf for their livelihood.

In the year since Horizon, the government has conducted investigations, industry has pointed fingers, and teams continue to work feverishly to minimize the damage. The disaster was a wake-up call for the nation that we need strong oversight of how drilling companies conduct business.


Despite spiking gas prices, Colorado oil shale years from production … if ever – The Colorado Independent 04/13/11

David O. Williams | April 13, 2011 | Reposted from The Colorado Independent

Observers of the century-long quest to extract oil from the shale rocks of Colorado’s Western Slope are fond of saying “oil shale is the fuel of the future … and always will be.” Never commercially viable because of the costs and resources needed to heat and extract the kerogen trapped in the rocks, an estimated 2 trillion barrels of shale oil remains locked up – perhaps forever.

But why then has Shell spent an estimated $200 million so far on research, development and demonstration (RD&D) at its Mahogany Research Project in western Colorado? And at what point will gas prices rise so high that the cost of producing shale oil suddenly makes sense?

“All of the major companies are doing oil shale because they think it’s an interesting and high-potential area, but they’re not in a hurry to make it productive,” said Jeremy Boak, director of the Center for Oil Shale Technology and Research (COSTAR) at the Colorado School of Mines in Golden. COSTAR’s research is described on its website as “industry-driven and science-guided.”

[Read more.]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 33 other followers